Wednesday, 09 January 2019 13:06

Turkey woos Eritrean Muslims

Written by

January 9, 2019 News

Eritrean Muslims courted by Erdogan as they set up office in Istanbul

The Eritrean Ulama’a League (Rabita-i Ulama Eritriye), a Muslim organization that is seen as close to the Muslim Brotherhood, opened an office in Istanbul on Jan. 5, 2019.

The inauguration was attended by Yasin Aktay, chief advisor to ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) leader and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, as keynote speaker.

The Eritrean Ulama’a League is supported by the Erdogan government, which has been pursuing a global campaign to woo various Muslim groups including the Muslim Brotherhood and Jamaat-e-Islami.

Among the guests were Abdul-Hamid al-Ani, director of information at the Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq (AMSI).

In February 2017 Sheikh Burhan Said, president of the Eritrean Ulama’a League, came to Istanbul and visited the Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (IHH), a charity group that has been identified as an arms smuggler to jihadist groups in Libya and Syria and was previously reported by Russia to the United Nations Security Council for links to the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL).

Sheikh Burhan Said, the president of Eritrean Ulama’a League visited headquarters of the Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (IHH) in Istanbul, Turkey.

The IHH, backed by the Turkish government, works closely with Turkish intelligence agency the National Intelligence Organization (MIT).

In a televised interview last year, Erdogan aide Aktay advocated a caliphate vision for Turkey, calling the Muslim Brotherhood and Jamaat-e-Islami Turkey’s soft power proxies.

Aktay was deputy chairman of the ruling AKP responsible for managing the AKP’s foreign relations and served as party spokesperson. He is known to be an influential figure in shaping Erdogan government policies in the Arab and Muslim worlds.

Abdul-Hamid al-Ani, director of information at the Association of Muslim Scholars in Iraq (AMSI), attended the event.


Background from Awate 2015

An Initiative To Form An Eritrean Muslim Council

May 14, 2015 All http://awate.com/?p=107078">15

Gedab News learned that a  group of Eritrean sheikhs and scholars are in a three-day conference in Turkey; they are expected to form an Eritrean Muslim Council. Many Eritrean Muslims do not recognize the Dar Al Iftaa that was assembled by the Eritrean ruling party and which is headed by Sheikh Alamin who was appointed by the PFDJ regime.

Traditionally, the Eritrean Muslim Mufti was elected by the congregations of the mosque based on a Muslim consensus. The last formal Eritrean Grand Mufti was the late Mufti Ibrahim AlMukhtar who died in 1969.

The Eritrean government curtails the freedom of religious institution which are under the control of the Eritrean government which administers them through the government’s Religious Affairs Department. The interference in religious affairs is so pervasive that in 2007 the government forcefully dethroned Abuna Antonios the patriarch of the Eritrean Orthodox Church and appointed Abuna Deskorios in his place. The dethroned Abun had protested the interference of the government in church affairs and demanded the release of Christian prisoners.Abune Antonios, who was born in 1927, is still held under house arrest since 2006. The Abun was enthroned on March 2004 as the Patriarch of Orthodox Tewahedo Church of Eritrea in a ceremony presided by Pope Shenouda III,  the pope of the Coptic Orthodox Church of Egypt. The appointment of Abuna Dekerios is rejected by His Holiness Pope Shenouda III who “refused to recognize [it] as a canonical act.” Several Oriental Orthodox Churches and an overwhelming number of Eritreans Orthodox Christians also reject the appointment of Abune Deskerios.

The other Eritrean churches also  do not fare any better; the Catholic Church had its publication stopped and some religious sects are denied any government service rights due to their conscientious objection to carry arms or get involved in political affairs. Many are languishing in unknown prison locations.Eritrea is mainly composed of Christians and Muslims. Christianity entered the region in the third century AD while Islam entered it while the Prophet of Islam was still being chased out of his birthplace, Mecca.

At present, while their Christian brethren have synods in the Diaspora, Eritrean Muslims do not have a council that airs their voice or attends to their religious affairs. In the past, several efforts to create a council that represents Eritrean Muslims failed and its absence left the matter in the hands of individuals and political groups.

There are great expectations among Muslims to see the creation of the Council succeed hoping that it will attend to their religious matters and provide them with spiritual guidance. An Eritrean elder told Gedab News, “The absence of such guidance has resulted in the fragmentations of Muslims and weakened their resolve; the vacuum is exposing our youth to the risks of religious fanaticism.”

A handful of Eritrean-European Muslims have fallen prey to fanatic forces like ISIS.  Several people contacted by Gedab News had cautious views about the Turkey meeting. Most of them expressed fear that it might dwell and reflect inter-Muslim sectarian issue of jurisprudence while at the same time hoped the council adopts a moderate, uniting outlook similar to the one that Eritrean Muslims had under the leadership of the late Mufti Ibrahim Mukhtar.In recent years, Turkey has taken the lead in reviving and promoting the forward looking traditional Islam. The meeting in Turkey is expected to issue a press release.

Source=https://eritreahub.org/turkey-woos-eritrean-muslims

ኣብ ተለቪዥን ቀሪቦም ናብ ህዝቢ መልእኽቶም ዘሕለፉ ኣካየድቲ እቲ ዕልዋ

ኣብ ተለቪዥን ቀሪቦም ናብ ህዝቢ መልእኽቶም ዘሕለፉ ኣካየድቲ እቲ ዕልዋ

 

ታሕተዎት ወተሃደራውያን ሓለፍቲ ጋቦን ስልጣን እታ ሃገር ከም ዝተረከቡ ኣፍሊጦም፡

ኣብ ምዕራብ ኣፍሪቃ እትርከብ ሃገረ ጋቦን፡ ንዝሓለፈ ሓመሳ ዓመታት ብሓደ ስድራ'ያ ክትምራሕ ጸኒሓ።

እዞም ወተሃደራዊ ዕልዋ ዝገበሩ ታሕተዎት ወተሃደራውያን መራሕቲ፡ እዚ ተግባራ ''ዲሞክራሲ ንምውሓስ'' ከም ዘካድዎ ሓቢሮም።

እዞም ብኣቆጻጽራ ጋቦን ስዓት 4 ወጋሕታ ንሃገራዊት ሬድዮ እታ ሃገር ዝተቆጻጸሩ ታሕተዎት ሓለፍቲ፡ ''ሃገራዊ ዳግመ ምምሕያሽ'' ኣዊጆም ኣለዉ።

ኣብ ጎዶናታት ዋና ከተማ ጋቦን ሊበረቪል፡ ታንክታትን ድሩዓት መካይንን ብብዝሒ ይርኣያ ኣለዋ።

ፕረዚደንት ዓሊ ቦንጎ ኣብ 2009 ካብ ኣቡኡ ዑመር ቦንጎ ስልጣን ብምርካብ፡ ንጋቦን ክመርሓ ድሕሪ ምጽናሕ ካብ ወርሒ ነሓሰ ጅሚሩ ብጽኑዕ ሓሚሙ ይርከብ።.

ፕረዚደንት ዓሊ ቦንጎ፡ ካብ ኣቡኡ ስልጣን ድሕሪ ምርካብ ኣብ 2016 ኣብ ዝተገበረ ምጥፍፋእ ነይርዎ ዝተብሃለ ፕረዚደንታዊ ምርጫ ዳግም ተዓዊቱ'ዩ ንጋቦን ክመርሓ ጸኒሑ።

ፕረዚደንት ዓሊ ቦንጎ ዝሓለፈ ክልተ ወርሒ ድሕሪ ዘጋጠሞ ወቕዒ ኣብ ሕክምና ሞሮኮ'ዩ ክእለ ጸኒሑ።

ፕረዚደንት ጋቦን ዓሊ ቦንጎ

ፕረዚደንት ጋቦን ዓሊ ቦንጎ

 

Sunday, 06 January 2019 19:23

ሎሚ ኤርትራ !!

Written by

ጻሓይ ሪኹም ኣይትፍረዱ

ኣብ ዕራርቦ ኣይትፍረዱ

ጥልመት ሱር ሰዲዱ

ግፍዒ ብድዔ ሰዊዱ

መጋርያ ተንኮል ተኣጊዱ

             ዕቁር ዝወዓለቶ ጸጋማ

             ለይቲያ ትድሕድሖ እዛ ከተማ

             ትምኒት ኣለዋ ዕላማ

              ትነግር ኣላ ሕሰማ

              ናይ ዕዳጋ ቃላት ነይጠቅማ

              ኣንፈት መጻኢኣ ብደዋ ሓሊማ

              ንሰላም ቅሳነት ኢላ ደምዲማ

ሎሚ እያ ኤርትራ ንብዓታ ተውሕዞ

ጸልማት ተኸዲና ተነብዕ ትቁንዞ

ግን ብሕልና እዩ ዝስማዕ

ኣብ ልቢ ሰብ ምስ በለ ረማዕ፣

                  ንምንታይ ተጫኻኺኑ

                  ዓገብ ባሃሊ ተሳኢኑ

                  ሰብ ንሰብ ክገዝኦ እዋኑ

                  ረኤይዎሞ ክትኣምኑ

                  ኩሉ ክሓስብ ንዕምሩ

                  ከም መንዳዓት ኣብ ሕቆ ሰብ ሰፊሩ

                  እንታይ ድኣሉ  ጉዱ እንትይ ነገሩ

                   ሃገርካን ባህልኻን ክፈርስ እናራኣኻ ምስጋሩ

                   ሃሲስካ ምጥፋእዶ ኣይኮነን ንሓዋሩ

                   ህዝብና እውን በብሓደ ከይዱ ጸሪሩ።

ሓርነት ዋሕስ ኢኺ ክንድኹሉ

ንስኺ እንተለኺ ንህሉ

እንተዘየለኺ ንጽምሉ

ያዕ በልዮም ነቶም ዘታልሉ

ድሕሪ ሃገር ይሕሊፍካብ ምሃብ እንታይ ክገብሩ

                     ቅድም ኣብ ገድሊ

                     ሕሰም ጎሲዔ

                     መሰላተይ ውን ተዘሪዔ

                     ኣጉሲዔ ምረት

                     መሲለ ቓረት

                     ሎሚ ወን ገድሊ

                     ንቃለስ ብዕሊ

                     ሕድሪ ስውኣትና ከነለሊ

                     ክነድሕኖ ንህዝብና ካብ ነውራም ሃላሊ።

ብ ሚካኤል ኣጎስቲኖ / ጀርመን

    06.01.2019

                

ርእሰ-ዓንቀጽ ሰዲህኤ

ኣብዚ ተጸሚድናዮ ዘለና ናይ መሰረታዊ ለውጢ ቃልሲ  ክንጽመድ ዘገደደና ምኽንያት፤ ናይ ሃገርናን ህዝብናን ዘየደቅስ ሃለዋት እምበር፡ ካልእ ኣይኮነን። ሃለዋት ኤርትራን ህዝባን ካብ ነዊሕ ግዜ ጀሚሩ ብሰንክቲ ሓደራ ህዝብን ሰማእታቱን ክሒዱ ከም ቁርዲድ ጨምዲዱ ሒዝዎም ዘሎ፡ ወትሩ ገበናቱ፡ ኣበራቱን ጥልመታቱን እንዝርዝሮ ናይ ኣዝዮም ውሑዳት ጉጅለ ምዃኑ፡ ኣይኮነንዶ ንዓና ነቶም ቀጥታዊ ሰብ ጉዳይ ኤርትራውያን፡ ንኹሎም ምእንቲ መሰል ሰባትን ልዕልና ሕግን ዝግደሱ ወገናት ካብ ዝንጽር ነዊሕ ግዜ ኮይኑ እዩ። ኣብዚ ወሳኒ ዕማም እንሳተፍ ከኣ “ሕማምን ቃንዛን ህዝበይ ነዓይ እውን ሕማመይን ቃንዛይንዩ” ብዝብል ናጻ ተወፋይነት ምዃኑ ንጹር እዩ።

ኣብ ኤርትራ ዘሎ ሕሱም ህይወት ተረዲእካ፡ ዓቕምኻ ከተወፊ ንቃልሲ ቅሩብ ምዃን በይኑ ናብ ዓወት ዘብጽሕ ኣይኮነን። ነቲ ዕገበት ኣሽሪፍካ ኣብ ዓወት እትበጽሓሉ፡ ንኩነታት ሃገርካን ህዝብኻን ኣብ ግምት ዘእተወን ነዊሕ ዝጠመተን እስትራተጅን በብምዕራፉ ዝስረሓሉ ሜላታትን ምሕንጻጽ ኣዝዩ ወሳኒ እዩ። እቲ ድሌትን ቅሩብነትን በዚ እንተዘይተሰንዩ ግና ስምዒት ጥራይ ኮይኑ ናይ ምትራፉ ዕድል ሰፊሕ እዩ። ኣብዚ መዳይዚ ዘዕውት ስራሕ ብመሰረቱ ሓባራዊ እዩ። ሓባራዊ ዝኾነሉ ቀንዲ ምኽንያት እቲ ወጽዓ ኮነ፡ ነቲ ወጽዓ ስዒርካ ዝመጽእ ራህዋን ቅሳነትን ናይ ሓባር ስለ ዝኾነ እዩ። እዚ ኣተሓሕዛዚ ንክዕወት፡ ጸብለል ክብሉ ዝግበኦም ኣነን ንሱን ወይ ንሕናን ንሳቶምን ዝብሉ ተጠማመቲ ሓሳባት ዘይኮኑ እቲ ብኹሉ መለክዑ ጉልበትን ዓቕምን ዘሰውድ “ንሕና” ዝብል  ክኸውን  ይግበኦ።

“ንሕና” ንዝብል ቃና ከነሕይል፡ ኣነ፡ ንሱን ንሳን፤ ንሳቶምን ንሳተንን ኣወጊድና፡ ናይ ኣተሓሳስባ ብዙሕነት ጨፋሊቕና፡ ሓደ ሰልፊ፡ ሓደ ውድብ ወይ ሓደ ማሕበር ጥራይ ንኹን ማለት ኣይኮነን። መሰረታዊ ሸቶኡ ኣብዛ እናተቐንዘወት ዘናግፋ ስኢና ትጽወዓና ዘላ ኤርትራን ህዝባን ራህዋ የረጋግጽ ዝብል ዝተወደበ ኣተሓሳስባታት እሞኸኣ ዝተባባዕ እምበር ዝኹነን ኣይኮነን። ብመሰረቱ እውን ቃልስና ነቲ ብናይ ህግደፍ ኣተሓሳስባታት ዝተነድቀ ዓዲ ዘየእቱ እንተዘይርዒምኩም ናትኩም ናይ ኣተሓሳስባ ምርጫ ክህልወኩም የብሉን ዝብል በሓቲ ፖሊሲ ኣወጊድካ፡ ኩለ-መዳያዊ ብዙሕነታዊ ኣተሓሳስባ ምውሓስ እዩ። ናይ ኣተሓሳባ ኣማራጽታት ግና ኣብ ማእከላይ ቦታ ተራኺቦም ኣብቲ ዘሰማምዖም ብሓባር እንተዘይ ተሰሊፎም ወጽዓ ክጸርጉ ከምዘይክእሉ፡ ኣብ ተመኩሮና ክንዕዘቦ ዝጸናሕና እዩ። ጸገምና ዝተፈላለየ ኣተሓሳስባ ምሕዝ ዘይኮነስ ከከም ቅርበት ናይቲ ሓሳባት ክንጽንብሮ ወይ ከነላፍኖ ዘይምብቃዕና ምዃኑ እውን መዛግብ ተመኩሮና ዝምስክሮ እዩ። ነዚ እንተበቒዕና ኢና ከኣ ናይ ኣተሓሳስባ ብዙሕነትና ምንጪ ብርታዐናን መልክዕናን ዝኸውን። እንዳተደላለየ ተመዓዳድዩ ዝነብር ብዙሕነት ግና፡ ግዳይ በበይንኻ ዓቕምኻን ግዜኻን ምብኻንዩ ዝኸውን። ተመኩሮና ነዚ እውን ኣርእዩና እዩ። ስለዚ ርሑቕ ከይከድና ካብ ተመኩሮና ሕማቑ ኮነ ጽቡቑ ክንዝክር ንኽእል ኢና። ዘኪርና ንመሃረሉዶ ወይስ መንገዲ ጥፍኣት ክነሱ ደጋጊምና ነታትዮ ኣብ ቀቅድሜና ዘሎ ፈተና እዩ።

እቲ ወለድና “ኣብ መስርሕ ኣይኮነንዶ ህይወት ዘለዎ እምኒ እውን ይጋጮ እዩ” ዝብልዎ ዝተፈላለየ ሓሳብ ምሓዝ ንቡር ምዃኑ ንምሕባር እዩ። ኣብ ካብ ሓደ ሰብ ንላዕሊ ሓቢርካ ዝንበረሉ ወይ ዝሰረሓሉ፡ ናይ ሓሳብ ፍልልይ ዘይረኣየሉ ህይወት ምጽባይ ሕልሚ እዩ። ከምዚ ዓይነት ብሕትው ህይወት እንዳመረጽካ፡ ኣብ ካልእ ከይከድና፡ ሰብ ሓዳር ሰብኣይን ሰበይትን፡ ወለድን ውሉድን፡ ብሓቢርካ እተስርሕ መሻርኽቲ፡ ሓቢርካ እትነብር ጐረባብቲ፡ ሓቢርካ እትጐዓዝ መጋይሽቲ ኮታ ብሓጺሩ ትርጉም ዘለዎ ናይ ሓባር ህይወት ክትምስርት ኣይመተኻእለን። ግደ ናይዚ ምስ ፍልልይካ ብሓደ ምንባርን ምስራሕን፡ ኣብዚ ንዛረበሉ ዘለና ፖለቲካዊ ዛዕባ ከኣ ኣዝዩ ዝዓዘዘ እዩ። ስለዚ ከምቲ ንጸልማት ብብርሃን፡ ንድንቁርና ብፍልጠት፡ ምስርዓር ዝከኣል ንናይ ኣተሓሳባ ፍልልይ ከኣ ብተቐራሪብካ፡ ህዝባዊ ሓላፍነትካ ተረዲእካ እሂንምሂን ምብህሃል ምስዓር እንዳተኽእለ ኢና ክሳብ ሕጂ ዘይከኣልናዮ ዘለና። ንመጻኢ እውን ግዜ በሊዕና ሓይልና ከነዳኽም እንተዘይኮይና ነዚ ክሳብ ሕጂ ዘይከኣልናዮ ካብ ምኽኣል ወጻኢ መዋጸኦ ከምዘየብልና ተረዲእና ነቲ ነዚ ንምኽኣል ነርእዮ ዘለና ፈንጠርጠራት ምጉልባቱ ምርጫ ዘይኮነ ግድነት እዩ።

ከም ኣካል ናይዚ ኣብ ዝተፈላለየ ኩርናዕ ደንበ ተቓውሞና ዝረአ ዘሎ ሓቢርካ ናይ ምስራሕ ንቕሎታት፡ ናይዚ ክከኣል ዝግበኦ ክነሱ ክሳብ ሕጂ ዘይተኽእለ፡ ጸገም መፍትሒ፡ ሰልፊ ዲሞክራሲ ህዝቢ ኤርትራን (ሰዲህኤ) ሃገራዊ ድሕነት ኤርትራ-ሕድርን ሃድኤ-ሕድሪ)፡ ብመንጽርቲ ኣቐዲሙ ዝተገልጸ፡ ኣብ ክንዲ በበይንና ምጥፍእ፡ ሓቢርና ክንዕወት የኽእል ኢልና ዝኣመንሉ ምርጫ ወሲድና ናብ ሓድነታዊ ጉባአ ንጉዓዝ ኣለና። ኣብዚ ካብ ተመኩሮኡ ተማሂሩ፡ ንሓድነት መተካእታ ከምዘየብሉ ዘስተማቐረ ጉዕዘኡ ብዙሓት ብሓላፍነት እንተዘይተታሒዞም ንድሕሪት ዝመልሱ ብደሆታት ኣየጋጠምዎን ማለት ኣይኮነን። ኣብ ናይ ክሳብ ሕጂ ጉዕዞና ናብ ሓድነታዊ ጉባአና፡ ነቶም ዘጋጥሙ  ክሰዓሩ ዝግበኦም ብደሆታት ስዒርካ ናይ ምሕላፍ ቅርቡነት እንተልዩ ዘይስገሩ ኮይኖም ኣይረኸብናዮምን። ነዚ ክንበቅዕ ከኣ ኣብ ክንዲ ነቲ ንእሽቶ ዝፈላሊ ምትዕብባይ ነቲ ዓቢ ዘሰማምዕ መሊስካ ምግዛፉ ኣብ ዓወት ከምዘብጽሕ ብግቡእ ተረዲእና ኣለና። ኣብ ከምዚ ኩነታት ነቲ ወለድና “ጸባ እውን እምብዛ እተጠሚትካዮ ይጽልም እዩ” ዝብልዎ ብግቡእ ተገንዚብና ኣብ ክንዲ ኣብ ሕሉፍ ምጽብጻብ ንቕድሚት ክንቋመት ከም ዝግበኣና ተገንዚብና ኣለና።

እዚ ክልቴና ወገናት ንድሕሪት ከምዘይምለስን ከምእነዕዉቶን ርግጸኛታት ኮይና ንኸዶ ዘለና መስርሕ ሓድነት ካብቲ ኣብ ደንብ ተቓውሞና ክሓብር ዝግበኦ ዓቕሚ ኣዝዩ ንኡስ ምዃኑ ፍሉጥ እዩ። መተባብዕን ዓዳምን ኣብነት ክኸውን ከምዝኽእል ግና ዘጠራጥር ኣይኮነን። ከምኡ ስለ ዝኾነ ከኣ ንጉዳይ ሓቢርካ ምስራሕ ዝምልከት ጻዕሪ በዚ ከይተደረትና፡ ነቲ ምስ ካለኦት ዝተፈላለዩ ውድባትን ጽላላትን እንተ ናብ ምሉእ ሓድነት ወይ ናብ ጽላል ከብጸሓና ወጢንና ንሰርሓሉ ዘለና ርክባት ክንቅጸለሉ ኢና። ናይ ኩልና ሰብ ዋኒን ማዕረ ተገዳስነትን ቅሩብነትን ተወሲኽዎ፡  ነቲ ክሳብ ሕጂ ዘይከኣልናዮ ክንክእሎ ምዃና ከኣ ሰብ ምሉእ ተስፋ ኢና።

Sunday, 06 January 2019 13:32

Radio Demtsi Harnnet Sweden 05.01.2019

Written by

ሽወደናዊ ዓርኪ ሰውራ ኤርትራ፡ ነብስሄር ሮልፍ ሳንድስትሮም: ብ4 ጥሪ 1941 ዓ.ም ተወሊዱ፤ ብዕለት 5 ታሕሳስ 2018 ድማ ካብ’ዛ ዓለም ተፈልዩና። ነብስሄር ካብ ሰብዓታት ኣትሒዙ ምስ ብጾቱ ክርስቲና ብዮርክ፡ ቡ ቡቨልስታም: ቶማስ በርግስትሮምን ካልኦትን ኰይኖም ኤርትርያን ግሩፐን (ናይ ኤርትራ ጕጅለ) ብዝብል ስም፡ ንፍትሓውነት ሰውራ ኤርትራ ደጊፎምን ተጣቢቖምን ኢዮም። ኣብ ርእሲኡ ድማ፡ ንኤርትራውያን ዝኸውን ነገራውን ሰብኣውን ሓገዛትን ኣበርኪቶምና  ናይ ተለቪዥን ፈነዋታትን ፊልምታትን እውን ኣቕሪቦም ኢዮም።

ነብስሄር ሮልፍ ሳንድስትሮም ብዕለት 4 ጥሪ 2019 ኣብ ስቶክሆልም: ሽወደን ሓመድ ኣዳም ለቢሱ። ኣባላት ሰዲህኤ ኣብ’ቲ ናይ ቀብሪ ስነ-ስርዓት ተረኺቦም/ን፡ ብስም ሰልፎም/ፈን ኣኽሊል ዕንባባ ኣብ መቓብሩ ኣንቢሮም/ን። በዚ ኣጋጣሚዚ፡ ንነብስሄር መንግስተ-ሰማይ የዋርሶ፣ ንክርስቲና ብዮርክን ወዶም ኡሎፍ ሳንድስትሮምን ድማ እግዚኣብሄር ጽንዓት ይሃቦም፡ ጠሉ ድማ የውርደሎም እናበልኩ ብስም ኣባላትን መሰረታትን ሰልፊ ዲሞክራሲ ህዝቢ ኤርትራ ናይ ሓዘኖም ተኻፈልቲ ምዃና ክገልጽ እፈቱ።

መንግስተኣብ ኣስመሮም

ኣቦ መንበር ሰዲህኤ

4 ታሕሳስ 2019

 Mix

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Olof  Sandström

Swedish friend of Eritrea, Mr Rolf Sandström was born on 4 January 1941 and has passed away on 5 December 2019. Mr Rolf Sandström, Ms Christina Björk, Mr. Bo Bovelstamm, Mr Thomas Bergström and others have from the begining of the seventies created an association under the name of “Eritrean Gruppen” and advocated for the Eritrean Revolution's legitimate and just cause. In addition they have delivered material and humanitarian aid to the needy Eritreans inside Eritrea and in the refugee camps in the Sudan. They have also contributed television and film reportages about the revolution to the Swedish and Eritrean public.

Mr Rolf was buried on 4 January 2018 in Stockholm, Sweden. EPDP members in Sweden have laid a bunch of flowers to his memory on his burial ground.

May the deceased soul rest in peace in God’s hand.

In the name of Eritrean People’s Democratic Party’s rank and file I convey my condolences to Ms Kristina Björk and their son Olof Sandström.

Menghesteab Asmerom

EPDP Chairman

4 January 2019

Friday, 04 January 2019 10:16

Radio Demtsi Harnnet Kassel 03.01.2019

Written by
 
The reforms by the country’s new prime minister are clashing with its flawed Constitution and could push the country toward an interethnic conflict.
 
Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed.CreditCreditAlex Welsh for The New York Times 

By Mahmood Mamdani

Mr. Mamdani is the director of the Institute of Social Research at Makerere University in Kampala, Uganda, and a professor at Columbia University.

 
Jan. 3, 2019

Mr. Abiy has been celebrated as a reformer, but his transformative politics has come up against ethnic federalism enshrined in Ethiopia’s Constitution. The resulting clash threatens to exacerbate competitive ethnic politics further and push the country toward an interethnic conflict.

The 1994 Constitution, introduced by Prime Minister Meles Zenawi and the Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front governing coalition, recast the country from a centrally unified republic to a federation of nine regional ethnic states and two federally administered city-states. It bases key rights — to land, government jobs, representation in local and federal bodies — not on Ethiopian citizenship but on being considered ethnically indigenous in constituent ethnic states.

The system of ethnic federalism was troubled with internal inconsistencies because ethnic groups do not live only in a discrete “homeland” territory but are also dispersed across the country. Nonnative ethnic minorities live within every ethnic homeland.

Ethiopia’s census lists more than 90 ethnic groups, but there are only nine ethnically defined regional assemblies with rights for the officially designated majority ethnic group. The nonnative minorities are given special districts and rights of self-administration. But no matter the number of minority regions, the fiction of an ethnic homeland creates endless minorities.

Ethnic mobilization comes from multiple groups, including Ethiopians without an ethnic homeland, and those disenfranchised as minorities in the region of their residence, even if their ethnic group has a homeland in another state.

Ethnic federalism also unleashed a struggle for supremacy among the Big Three: the Tigray, the Amhara and the Oromo. Although the ruling E.P.R.D.F. is a coalition of four parties, the Tigray People’s Liberation Front representing the Tigray minority has been in the driving seat since the 1991 revolution. The Amhara, dominant before 1991, and the Oromo, the largest ethnic group in the country, complained they were being treated as subordinate minorities.

When the government announced plans to expand Addis Ababa, the federally run city-state, into bordering Oromo lands, protests erupted in 2015. The Amhara joined and both groups continued to demand land reform, equal political representation and an end to rights abuses.

Ethiopian army soldiers controlled protestors from the capital and those displaced by ethnic-based violence over the weekend in Burayu, as they demonstrated demanding justice from the government in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia last September.CreditMulugeta Ayene/Associated Press

Prime Minister Haile Mariam Desalegn, who took office in 2012 after the death of the long-term premier and Tigray leader Mr. Zenawi, responded brutally to the protests. Security forces killed between 500 and 1,000 protesters in a year. Faced with a spiraling crisis, the ruling E.P.R.D.F. coalition appointed Mr. Abiy, a former military official and a leader of the Oromo People’s Democratic Organization — a constituent of the ruling coalition — as prime minister.

Mr. Abiy’s reforms have been applauded but have also led to greater ethnic mobilization for justice and equality. The E.P.R.D.F.’s achievement since 1991 was equal education for girls and boys, rural and urban, leading to greater prominence of women, Muslims and Pentecostal groups.

The recent reforms of Mr. Abiy, who was born to a Muslim Oromo father and an Orthodox Amhara mother and is a devout Pentecostal Christian, have further broadened political participation to underprivileged groups.

Mobilization of ethnic militias is on the rise. Paramilitaries or ethnic militias known as special police, initially established as counterinsurgency units, are increasingly involved in ethnic conflicts, mainly between neighboring ethnic states. A good example is the role of the Somali Special Force in the border conflict with the Oromia state, according to Yonas Ashine, a historian at Addis Ababa University. These forces are also drawn into conflicts between native and nonnative groups.

Nearly a million Ethiopians have been displaced from their homes by escalating ethnic violence since Mr. Abiy’s appointment, according to Addisu Gebregziabher, who heads the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission.

Fears of Ethiopia suffering Africa’s next interethnic conflict are growing. Prime Minister Abiy himself is constantly invoking religious symbols, especially those linked to American Protestant evangelical megachurches, and has brought a greater number of Pentecostals into the higher ranks of government.

Ethiopians used to think of themselves as Africans of a special kind, who were not colonized, but the country today resembles a quintessential African system, marked by ethnic mobilization for ethnic gains.

In most of Africa, ethnicity was politicized when the British turned the ethnic group into a unit of local administration, which they termed “indirect rule.” Every bit of the colony came to be defined as an ethnic homeland, where an ethnic authority enforced an ethnically defined customary law that conferred privileges on those deemed indigenous at the expense of non-indigenous minorities.

The move was a response to a perennial colonial problem: Racial privilege for whites mobilized those excluded as a racialized nonwhite majority. By creating an additional layer of privilege, this time ethnic, indirect rule fragmented the racially conscious majority into so many ethnic minorities, in every part of the country setting ethnic majorities against ethnic minorities. Wherever this system continued after independence, national belonging gave way to tribal identity as the real meaning of citizenship.

Many thought the Tigray People’s Liberation Front, representing a minority in the dominant coalition, turned to ethnic federalism to dissolve and fragment Ethiopian society into numerous ethnic groups — each a minority — so it could come up with a “national” vision. In a way it replicated the British system.

But led by Mr. Zenawi, the T.P.L.F. was also most likely influenced by Soviet ethno-territorial federalism and the creation of ethnic republics, especially in Central Asia. Ethiopia’s 1994 Constitution evoked the classically Stalinist definition of “nation, nationality and people” and the Soviet solution to “the national question.”

As in the Soviet Union, every piece of land in Ethiopia was inscribed as the ethnic homeland of a particular group, constitutionally dividing the population into a permanent majority alongside permanent minorities with little stake in the system. Mr. Zenawi and his party had both Sovietized and Africanized Ethiopia.

Like much of Africa, Ethiopia is at a crossroads. Neither the centralized republic instituted by the Derg military junta in 1974 nor the ethnic federalism of Mr. Zenawi’s 1994 Constitution points to a way forward.

Mr. Abiy can achieve real progress if Ethiopia embraces a different kind of federation — territorial and not ethnic — where rights in a federal unit are dispensed not on the basis of ethnicity but on residence. Such a federal arrangement will give Ethiopians an even chance of keeping an authoritarian dictatorship at bay.

Mahmood Mamdani is the director of Makerere Institute of Social Research in Uganda, a professor of government at Columbia University and the author of “Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism.”

Source=https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/03/opinion/ethiopia-abiy-ahmed-reforms-ethnic-conflict-ethnic-federalism.html

Thursday, 03 January 2019 13:42

China v USA: an Egyptian view of the duel in the Red Sea

Written by

January 3, 2019 Horn of Africa, News, Other, Research & information, Uncategorized

Source: al Ahram

Sino-American duel in the Red Sea

The race for power and influence between the US and China in the East Africa and Red Sea region can only speed up in the coming years, writes Hicham Mourad

The US military base in Djibouti is located just a few miles from the Chinese base

Like several regional powers that have rushed in recent years to the southern Red Sea, various global powers have also established naval bases near the Bab Al-Mandeb Strait that controls the passage between the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden in the Indian Ocean.

Military Bases DjiboutiSome of these powers, often established in Djibouti on the western shore of the Red Sea, have a relatively old presence in this region of the Horn of Africa. France has had a military base there since 1977, the date of independence of this former French colony. The United States established a base there in 2002 after the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001. Other powers such as Italy, Japan and most recently China have also gained a foothold in Djibouti because of its strategic position to the southern entrance to the Red Sea and its relative political stability compared to its neighbours.

The last great power to set its sights on the Horn of Africa was Russia, which announced in August last year that it was going to build a “logistics” base on the Red Sea in Eritrea. Without indicating exactly where or when the project was to be carried out, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said after a meeting with his Eritrean counterpart that it aimed to boost bilateral trade and infrastructure investment.

The projected base will be Russia’s first in Africa since the end of the Cold War, and it will provide it with the opportunity to project its power across the Middle East and the shipping routes between Asia and Europe. The project is undoubtedly the result of the determination of Russian President Vladimir Putin to assert the global role of his country and to ensure its place in the race for influence with the US and China.

In August 2017, China inaugurated its naval base in Djibouti at a cost of $600 million and hosting up to 10,000 soldiers. According to the Chinese government, the base is intended to help Beijing in its humanitarian and peacekeeping missions in Africa (2,400 Chinese soldiers are now deployed on the continent) and Western Asia and to lead emergency relief, protection, and evacuation work of Chinese citizens living overseas and engage in military cooperation, including joint manoeuvres, and combat piracy.

The base will also be responsible for ensuring the security of international and strategic seaways near the Bab Al-Mandeb Strait, in order to protect China’s massive economic interests in Africa and the Middle East. It will serve as a transport route for raw materials from the Horn of Africa countries to China and electronic products from China to the Horn of Africa.

China has invested more than $30 billion in Sudan and South Sudan, for example, both of which are oil-rich countries. In addition, it has built a 750km railway line linking Addis Ababa in Ethiopia to the Red Sea via Djibouti. The Chinese base will see the extension of this rail network to the countries of the Horn of Africa region to assist in transporting goods between these countries and China through the port of Djibouti.

The establishment of the Chinese base in Djibouti also marks a break with Beijing’s traditional foreign policy focusing on the East Asian region. It is a projection of Chinese power that expresses the country’s growing interest in Africa and the Middle East, especially in the framework of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s “Belt and Road” initiative, also known as “One Belt, One Road”, which aims to establish land and sea routes linking China to Europe via Eurasia and the Middle East.

The base is a result of China’s desire to build a new “Maritime Silk Road” joining up “a string of pearls” in the shape of a series of Chinese “footholds” linking the Indian Ocean, the Gulf region and the Red Sea and serving the “One Belt, One Road” initiative announced in 2015. As part of this initiative, China plans to invest $8 trillion in infrastructure in 68 countries, including Djibouti, which is essential for the African and European routes to China.

CHINESE PLANS: The establishment of the first Chinese base in the region came after several years of increasing economic and commercial involvement in Africa and the Middle East.

Now the second-largest economy in the world after the United States, China plans to become the largest by the 2030s. In order to help achieve this, Beijing is seeking through its naval base in Djibouti to protect its growing economic interests in this part of the world. It is seeking to secure natural resources to support its economic growth, as can is clear when one considers that half the oil imported by China passes through the Bab Al-Mandeb Strait and most Chinese exports to Europe are channelled through the Gulf of Aden and the Suez Canal.

To serve its trade and economic interests in Africa, China is also investing heavily in the construction of infrastructure in the east of the continent. The most obvious example has been the construction of a railway line in Kenya between Nairobi, the capital, and the port of Mombasa on the Indian Ocean at a total cost of $3.6 billion. Inaugurated in May 2017, the railway is the most expensive infrastructure project undertaken in the country since Kenya’s independence in 1964.

In addition to China’s economic aid, investment and business activities in the Horn of Africa and the Middle East, the region is also home to thousands of Chinese workers. In 2015, Beijing evacuated 600 Chinese workers from Yemen because of the conflict in the country. In 2011, it sent a warship and a military transport plane to Libya to evacuate some 35,000 Chinese nationals following the overthrow of former Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi. The Libyan crisis was a major factor in the decision to establish a base in Djibouti.

The Chinese base was also built in the context of growing economic relations between Beijing and Djibouti, which allowed China to override the objections of the United States. Nearly 40 per cent of the financing of major infrastructure and investment projects in Djibouti now comes from China, and these have included the Ethiopia-Djibouti oil pipeline and the Ethiopia-Djibouti fresh water pipeline.

China’s Export Import Bank has granted $957 million to finance other infrastructure projects, including the railway line linking the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa to Djibouti City on the Bab Al-Mandeb Strait. It is hoped that this rail link with one of the African economies experiencing strong economic growth will turn Djibouti into a hub for East African trade.

This is particularly the case since Djibouti has few opportunities for economic growth outside the exploitation of its geostrategic location near the Bab Al-Mandeb Strait. In addition to direct financial gains from land leasing and foreign bases like that of China, employment opportunities for Djibouti citizens are provided by the US and French bases in the country, with these also contributing significantly to foreign trade. Port activity now accounts for 70 per cent of Djibouti’s GDP.

China’s military engagement in the Horn of Africa began in 2008 with mainly counter-piracy missions. Today, its commitment has broadened in line with the deepening of its economic and commercial relations with the region and as part of a nascent but growing global military engagement policy stretching from the South China Sea to East Africa. This has meant the establishment of a strong navy allowing China to project its power around the world, and naval bases like that in Djibouti will be essential to achieve this ambition.

A US Pentagon report released last year said that the Djibouti base, along with the regular visits of Chinese warships to foreign ports, reflected China’s growing global influence. Similarly, the Chinese have recently stepped up their naval patrols near the Gulfs of Oman and Aden.

Another indicator of China’s global ambition came in the parallel it drew between the inauguration of its base in Djibouti and the celebration of the legacy of Zheng He (1371-1433 CE), an early 15th-century Chinese admiral whose travels in the South China Sea and the Indian Ocean have become the symbol of past Chinese power and of China’s desire to see a new world order led by China.

Accompanied by 27,000 men on 62 large and 255 small ships, Zheng He led seven naval expeditions to Southeast Asia, the Middle East, and the east coast of Africa over 28 years during the Chinese Ming Dynasty. It is not a coincidence that the day Chinese ships embarked for the port of Djibouti on 11 July 2017 was the same day on which Zheng He undertook his famous voyages more than 600 years ago.

The Chinese vision of a new “Maritime Silk Road” is thus closely linked to the official celebration of Zheng He who brought fame and power to China centuries ago. In Chinese publications of recent years, Zheng He’s fleets are described as tools for economic growth, scientific research, peaceful cultural exchange and universal friendship. His travels are often seen as symbols of a global order based on trade rather than conflict.

However, it should be noted that the main objective of Zheng He’s travels was to assert the power and dominance of the Chinese Ming Dynasty and to collect tribute from local rulers.

photo: Reuters

US COUNTER-PLANS: Located just a few miles from the Chinese base, the US military base in Djibouti, called Camp Lemonnier, hosts some 4,000 soldiers.

It has several aims, the first of which is to assist in the fight against terrorism. The foremost target is Al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula in Yemen, which controls about a quarter of the central and eastern parts of the country. The US military regularly conducts secret operations and drone raids against this terrorist organisation from its base in Djibouti, as well as against the Islamist group Al-Shabab in Somalia that has carried out suicide bombings in the capital Mogadishu. This insurgency, which has spread to neighbouring Kenya, has become a key target of US President Donald Trump’s war on terrorism.

In addition to logistical and intelligence support to the Saudi-led coalition that has been fighting against the Houthi rebels in Yemen since March 2015, the US military in the Horn of Africa has been helping to ensure free navigation through the Bab Al-Mandab Strait. A large proportion of the oil exports going from the Gulf region to the West goes through this strait, as do almost all the US warships, including aircraft carriers and submarines, that cross the Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean. US warships, as well as those of the European Union, Russia and China, have also been conducting patrols in the Gulf of Aden since 2008 to combat piracy off the coast of Somalia.

However, the US, which has long dominated the region through its military presence and political influence, was caught off its guard by the decision of Djibouti to approve the installation on its soil of a Chinese naval base in 2016. Two years before this, Susan Rice, the then national security advisor to US president Barack Obama, came to Djibouti in order to head off a similar deal with Russia. However, Washington could do nothing to prevent China from setting up a base in Djibouti, given the solid and growing economic relations between the two countries.

The establishment of a Chinese military base in the Horn of Africa, the first outside China, is a negative strategic development for the US, and it has serious implications for the long-standing US dominance in the region. Shortly after the 2016 decision, the White House announced the renewal of the lease of the US base in the country for another 20 years and the doubling of its annual payments to Djibouti to $63 million, as well as plans to modernise the base at a cost of over $1 billion.

Among other things, the Pentagon fears that the installation of a Chinese base in Djibouti just a few miles from Camp Lemonnier will allow Beijing to monitor US military operations in the region and the means used in their implementation.

Moreover, in March last year Thomas Waldhauser, commander of the US Africa Command AFRICOM, warned the US Congress that China could threaten US interests in Africa, especially in the Red Sea, should it be allowed to take over the key port of Doraleh in Djibouti. This port had been operated by Dubai Ports World (DP World), a United Arab Emirates-owned company, since 2006, but the Djibouti government broke its agreement with the Emirati company and nationalised the port in February last year.

The race for power and influence in the East Africa and Red Sea region

According to Waldhauser, Djibouti had assured the United States that it would not lease the port to the Chinese, but he still warned that the US could not afford to run the risk of seeing the port fall under China’s control, since this could affect the resupplying of the US military base in the country and the ability of US Navy ships to refuel there. There was a need for the “rewriting of US military strategy in the region with China in mind”, he said.

Given China’s strong economic involvement in Djibouti, unmatched by the US, Washington seems to have sought an alternative in its neighbour Eritrea, which also enjoys a strategic position on the southern Red Sea. Some scholars believe that Eritrea could in future host a new American military base and allow US access to its ports, though for this to happen Eritrea would first have to break out of its diplomatic isolation and normalise relations with Ethiopia.

In order to bring this about, last year the US launched a quiet campaign by Christian Church leaders and US diplomats to lobby both sides to meet and resolve their differences. In April 2018 after the accession of new Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, US Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Donald Yamamoto visited Eritrea, the first such visit in over a decade, before travelling on to Ethiopia in a sign of the US interest in rekindling ties with Asmara.

Yamamoto had previously hosted meetings between senior officials of the two countries in Washington and set up diplomatic back-channels. Diplomatic sources said he had brought together Eritrean Foreign Minister Osman Saleh and Yemane Gebreab, a long-standing advisor of the Eritrean president, and former Ethiopian prime minister Hailemariam Desalegn, with a view to laying the foundations for a peace agreement to be announced a few months later.

Washington also encouraged its allies Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, which have important interests in the Horn of Africa particularly because of the war in Yemen, to mediate between Addis Ababa and Asmara to put an end to the state of war between the two countries. These efforts were successful thanks in part to Saudi and Emirati financial support, and in July 2018 Ethiopian Prime Minister Ahmed and Eritrean President Isaias Afwerki signed a peace agreement in Saudi Arabia ending two decades of enmity sparked by a two-year border conflict that broke out in 1998.

Faced with the growing influence of China in the Red Sea, the Horn of Africa, and on the African continent in general, the United States has been determined to counter the ambitions of Beijing. In its National Security Strategy for 2017, the Trump administration described China as a “revisionist power” and a “strategic competitor” of the US that was seeking to undermine US power, influence, security and prosperity. Like Russia, China is now seen as challenging US power, influence and interests.

The US recognises that it cannot match the scale of China’s investment in Africa, even as it has vowed to reduce its economic influence in the region. Washington is particularly concerned about the security implications of China’s taking control of strategic assets in the wider world as a result of unsustainable borrowing by developing countries, especially in Africa. Its strategy, therefore, partly relies on encouraging American companies to invest more in the continent, explaining why US loans have recently increased to Africa. This development has been widely seen as one way of countering Chinese largesse in Africa and in other emerging markets.

A recent study by the international law firm Baker McKenzie has indicated that the battle for influence between China and the United States is expected to intensify over the next decade. It notes that China spent $8.7 billion on infrastructure projects in Sub-Saharan Africa in 2017 alone and that the decision by Trump last October to change the US Overseas Private Investment Corporation (OPIC) into the International Development Finance Corporation (IDFC) and double its loans to $60 billion in the developing world, notably in Africa, was intended to counter the rapidly growing influence of China.

This decision will considerably speed up the race for influence in Africa, especially in the Horn of Africa region, between the two superpowers.

Source=https://eritreahub.org/china-v-usa-an-egyptian-view-of-the-duel-in-the-red-sea